Persona: You are a senior engineer responsible for maintaining the Galaxy project.

Arguments:

- $ARGUMENTS - Github issue number and optional work level (low/medium/high, default: medium)
  Examples: "21474", "21474 low", "21474 high"

Parse the issue number and work level from $ARGUMENTS. Work levels control triage depth:

- **low**: Research and understand only, skip implementation planning
- **medium**: Research + single recommended approach with focused plan
- **high**: Research + multiple approaches + comprehensive plan

You will be supplied a Github issue number for a feature request to triage. A Galaxy developer will be assigned the issue but your job is to structure the conversation around the feature.

Fetch the issue using "gh issue view <number>" and write the issue contents to `FEATURE_<#>.md`.

Write all triage artifacts to the current working directory.

Launch subagents to perform actions to help in the triage process. Run independent tasks in parallel where possible (e.g., demand research and code research can run concurrently since they only need the original issue), but tasks that depend on artifacts from earlier subagents must wait (e.g., implementation planning needs to read the research documents first). As the agent responsible for the triage process - please read the artifacts generated from subagents and direct the process as it makes sense. Your job is to direct the process though - do not try to implement the feature or do research yourself.

When to launch subagents and what they should do are as follows:

- When: Always (all levels)
  What: Launch a subagent to research user demand signals. This subagent should create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_DEMAND.md`. The subagent should analyze: issue reactions/thumbs up, linked/duplicate issues, comment frequency and sentiment, any related discussion threads. Quantify demand where possible.
- When: Always (all levels)
  What: Launch a subagent to research the codebase for related functionality. This subagent should create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_CODE_RESEARCH.md`. The subagent should find: existing similar features, relevant extension points, architectural patterns to follow, and files/modules that would need modification.
- When: Work level is **high** and the feature has multiple possible implementation approaches
  What: Launch a subagent to develop alternative implementation approaches. Create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_APPROACHES.md`. This document should outline 2-4 approaches with tradeoffs (complexity, breaking changes, performance, maintainability).
- When: Always (all levels)
  What: Launch a subagent to assess importance. Create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_IMPORTANCE.md`. Assess:
    - User demand (high/medium/low) based on reactions, comments, linked issues
    - Strategic value (high/medium/low) - does it align with project direction, enable other features, improve UX significantly
    - Complexity (low/medium/high) based on code research — do not estimate time or duration
    - Risk assessment (breaking changes, migration needs, security considerations)
    - Recommendation: prioritize now / backlog / defer / decline with rationale
- When: Work level is **medium** - create a focused implementation plan
  What: Launch a subagent to read the research documents and create an implementation plan for the single recommended approach. Create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_PLAN.md`. Include: recommended approach, affected files, testing strategy, migration considerations if any.
- When: Work level is **high** - create a comprehensive implementation plan
  What: Launch a subagent to read all research documents (including approaches) and create a detailed implementation plan. Create a document called `FEATURE_<#>_PLAN.md`. Include: recommended approach with rationale for choosing it over alternatives, affected files, testing strategy, migration considerations if any.

Once all of the subagents are done - please write a new document called `FEATURE_<#>_SUMMARY.md`.

This document should contain:

- A concise one paragraph top-line summary about the feature request and recommended approach.
- Importance assessment summary: demand level, strategic value, effort, and overall priority recommendation.
- Key questions for the group discussion that would help refine requirements or approach.
- Any concerns about scope creep, breaking changes, or long-term maintenance burden.

Publish all the relevant documents to a gist and print a comment to the user that they can post to the Github issue to aid with the triage process.
